E tão ridiculo quanto a crocs, so sendo um tremendo idiota cafona pra usar isso!

CAFONA….

Adoreiiii quero comprar,queria saber o site que posso comprar pq não estou achando xD

This is like those stereotypical evil cornoratiops you see in TV saying something like “We want more green energy!” all while in reality their proposal is for making it easier for them to keep burning coal…I am highly disappointed. If we know something about the development of the internet is that it will get more and more mobile. In effect, this forks the internet into an ‘open internet’ that will be doomed to obsolescence and a ‘wireless internet’ that will be full of anti-consumer crap.In part, this is all due to cell/(smart) phones in general promoting the most anti-consumer stunts ever and getting away with it. Claiming that it is too hard not to do it. But that’s actually more of a reason to make sure net neutrality covers them. The worst of it is that GOOG owes the open internet its success. There is no way 2 college students would have had their success in a locked environment similar to what cable is now (which is what the wireless internet will become). I guess that GOOG do not care as they already have their success. But at least I think I do care. I think I also owe a lot to the internet, and I think that many people feel like that. I really hope GOOG would back off on this.Maybe it is right that wireless infrastructure makes it too difficult to have net neutrality. I do not think that’s a reason not to enforce it. It is actually a reason to stop selling it until it becomes feasible to do it in a way that does not threaten consumers.Regarding the ‘now’ word in point 6. I do not think that’s an excuse. Apologists may think that it means that once wireless becomes more feasible google and verizon will finally promote net neutrality in wireless services. But it is not an appropriate time to be so naive. We need net neutrality in wireless services NOW. Not an empty promise to have it within five years.